[A6] Jo! Now: Files available for download !!!

[scd]

on 08-10-2003 16:10, Robert van der Kamp at robnet at wxs.nl wrote:

OK, clear. I just wanted to be sure we're on the same track (leuke
woordspeling!).

:-) Boele

> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 15:49, scd wrote:
>> on 08-10-2003 15:33, Robert van der Kamp at robnet at wxs.nl
> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 08 October 2003 15:21, scd wrote:
>>>> OK, what is the difference between string- en
>>>> brass-sounds to your opinion?
>>> 
>>> Strings sound like strings, while brass sounds sound
>>> like errr brass. ;P
>>> 
>>> Do I *have* to explain???
>> 
>> Uhhhrrr. yes. It was a serious question. What is the
>> precise difference soundewise?
> 
> Strings sound like close or more synth-like simulations of
> the real orchestral string section (violin, cello, bass).
> 
> Brass sounds simulate the orchestral brass section (horns,
> trumpets, trombones).
> 
> While strings are more wooly sounding, brass sounds are
> mostly smooth and have that typical slow filter envelope
> (wwwwoooooOOOOooowwwwww).
> 
> 
>> 
>> And how about pads? do they list under strings or brass?
> 
> Strings and brass all catergorize as pads in general:
> 
> Pads:
> - strings
> - brass
> - other
> 
> So you should create category names like:
> 
> PAD
> PAD/STRINGS
> PAD/BRASS
> 
> where the plain PAD name is used for everything not
> belonging to any of the subcategories.
> 
> 
> Does this help?
> 
> - Robert