[A6] RE: Neuron (ot)

[jason parizanski]

guys, i respect both of you and your opinions a lot, but please take 
this discussion off list its making my head hurt.

burn


On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 07:31  PM, Rhen, Kris wrote:

>      When you make statement such as this previous one of yours: "Does
> everyone need that kind of
>  modeling to make music? No. But the same class of synthesist that 
> loves
> the Z1 for what it does best (beyond playback samples) will love the
> Neuron...If someone doesn't see a synth for its particular strengths
> (and
> weaknesses) then they're probably better off sticking with a
> sampler/rompler IMO.", you quite clearly state your contempt for those
> whose opinions differ from yours, implying yourself to be a higher
> "class
> of synthesist" and presenting your opinions as more valuable than those
> of
> whom you disagree with. Since you made a number of similarly arrogant
> statements in your last response implying that those who don't agree
> with
> you have both feeble skills/hearing and a lesser standard of "good
> enough",
> a clear pattern of self-conceit is evident. No paranoia involved, 
> merely
> reading comprehension enabling one to see through your thinly-veiled
> insults/statements of imagined superiority.
> ------------------
> Vamp, you're reading waaay too much into this.  If you read what I 
> said, I
> was comparing SYNTHESIS to SAMPLES - they're very different things. 
> Don't
> you agree?  I have no contempt (except in your manufactured paranoia) 
> for
> samplers, romplers, or those that use them (in fact I have several 
> myself -
> so much for that delusion) - they have their uses as ALL synths do - 
> but yes
> I WILL stand by the statement that for physical modeling of physical
> instruments, the best TOOL is a synth that does physical modeling.  It
> doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that.  So, stop calling names 
> and
> trying to kill the messenger because that doesn't validate your points 
> any
> better.  If there is a pattern of self-conceit here, you're clearly the
> pattern-maker, in the need to demonize someone with a differing 
> opinion than
> yours.  I may make statements about what I see as a better synthesis 
> method
> for X or Y types of sounds, but you make statements about what YOU 
> IMAGINE
> as a personal motive or a personality - which IS the subjective stuff 
> of
> paranoia.  Finding faults with facts is facts, but finding fault with 
> motive
> is imagination, unless you know my true motives, which you've clearly 
> shown
> you haven't.  A clear pattern of self-delusion is apparent...
> KRIS
> _______________________________________________
> A6 mailing list
> A6 at code404.com
> http://code404.com/mailman/listinfo/a6
>