[A6] Anyone tried this with an A6?

[Chris Pickett]

Kurt Stengel wrote:
> I'm cool man :)  Didn't mean to come off harsh if I did but it seems so many
> people still talk about wish lists and gripe about really minor stuff when
> for an analog it does amazing things flexibility wise.  Digitally speaking
> it is out-horsed by some soft synths and probably a few VA's I can think of.
> But in the analog domain nothing beats it for bells and whistles.

I think the biggest problem is not just it has limitations sound and 
feature wise in several places but more that these aren't very well 
documented, which means you end up thinking you're gonna be able to do 
something that you just can't do and it gets annoying, since you waste 
hours trying to figure out what's wrong, and since these things are 
almost always found out post-purchase.

This is again why I think a wiki would be cool, so people can just go 
and document the limitations of the different parts of the synth so we 
don't have to keep rehashing stuff, and so owners know if they have a 
defective unit or if they're all really just like that.  Maybe we can 
just use Wikipedia, I'll ask.

Cheers,
Chris