[A6] A6 vs Minimoog soundbites

[Kurt Stengel]

That is b/c the Mini is lots better tonally :)  If anyone could do a close
replication w/ the A6 it would be Colin.  The Mini is just an amazing synth
and does not take alot of brains to make it sound wonderful.  That is why I
like it so much :)

Kurt

-----Original Message-----
From: a6-bounces at code404.com [mailto:a6-bounces at code404.com]On Behalf Of
Chris Pickett
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 7:09 PM
To: A6 List
Subject: Re: [A6] A6 vs Minimoog soundbites


Colin Chung wrote:
> some comapros I did for a forum, I will post some more
> in days to come :)
>
> firstly I set the A6 on ultrafast pitch and envelope engine optmiser
> settings, ENV3(VCA) level to 65, each VCO to 30-28 on the prefilter, and
> postfilter Moog filter 40. standard ADSR log1 shapes. No background and
temp
> tuning, and some random LFO modulation of the pitch, not much though :)
> VCO on the Mini set to 16', the A6 can't really do a 32' setting although,
> with the sub-oscillators set to level 27-28, you can get it an octave down
> with a throaty sound, but tonally its different.
>
> oh yeah Mini first in each case
> single VCO - resonance at 60% on the Mini and 25 on the A6.
>
>
http://www.members.optushome.com.au/blitzforce/Mini_vs_Sh2/CCJ_Minimoog_vs_A
> 6_16'_SawBass.mp3
>
>
> dual VCO saw now
> A6 seems to have less top end, and hump in the bottom end :)
>
http://www.members.optushome.com.au/blitzforce/Mini_vs_Sh2/CCJ_Minimoog_vs_A
> 6_16'_2VCOSawBass.mp3

I think I like the mini better in both cases.  You can't do any better
with the A6?

Chris
_______________________________________________
A6 mailing list
A6 at code404.com
http://code404.com/mailman/listinfo/a6