[A6] re:some waveform observations III

Chris Pickett chris.pickett at mail.mcgill.ca
Wed Dec 8 12:58:37 PST 2004


leo wrote:
> "elaborate"?:
> 
> 
> just follow the leash back the thread, read my previous post and you'll 
> find out what i just found ; this is a Perfect synth ,let's agree on 
> that. don't need NO technical specs to see that. everything is possible 
> as long as you believe in it. bugs??: just press the system reset( 
> softbuton xx) and the   A6 world will open itself for you.(sorry' get a 
> bit sarcastical too)
> feel everybody should have one , need one, buy one.(i already have one 
> and am very happy with it, even more happy then when i didn't have one, 
> in fact I even lost 11kg of weight and got a total remakeover within the 
> last two years , which costed me no more effort then 1/2 hour a day 
> !)(feel like getting a bit over the top now probably)
> still don't get it? : RTFM, this is a Great synth(truly) so please let's 
> stop talking nonsense and do the usual serious bussines.

I have read the manual.  I just don't understand how you managed, using 
your LFO trick, to make the A6 do additive granular and physical 
modelling and also be a full polyphonic sampler.  Maybe I'm just dumb. 
Can you (or somebody else who understands) give a detailed example, or 
maybe a few examples?  I've read the manual and the T&T document, this 
isn't in there.  I'm not disagreeing that the A6 is a wonderful synth.

Thanks kindly,
Chris



More information about the a6 mailing list