[A6] re:some waveform observations III
Chris Pickett
chris.pickett at mail.mcgill.ca
Wed Dec 8 12:58:37 PST 2004
leo wrote:
> "elaborate"?:
>
>
> just follow the leash back the thread, read my previous post and you'll
> find out what i just found ; this is a Perfect synth ,let's agree on
> that. don't need NO technical specs to see that. everything is possible
> as long as you believe in it. bugs??: just press the system reset(
> softbuton xx) and the A6 world will open itself for you.(sorry' get a
> bit sarcastical too)
> feel everybody should have one , need one, buy one.(i already have one
> and am very happy with it, even more happy then when i didn't have one,
> in fact I even lost 11kg of weight and got a total remakeover within the
> last two years , which costed me no more effort then 1/2 hour a day
> !)(feel like getting a bit over the top now probably)
> still don't get it? : RTFM, this is a Great synth(truly) so please let's
> stop talking nonsense and do the usual serious bussines.
I have read the manual. I just don't understand how you managed, using
your LFO trick, to make the A6 do additive granular and physical
modelling and also be a full polyphonic sampler. Maybe I'm just dumb.
Can you (or somebody else who understands) give a detailed example, or
maybe a few examples? I've read the manual and the T&T document, this
isn't in there. I'm not disagreeing that the A6 is a wonderful synth.
Thanks kindly,
Chris
More information about the a6
mailing list