[A6] Bugs & Feature Requests list

[Jeff Platt]

Well, I've probably talked too much already if I want to work on this
project again, but anyway.. So, you're right, David,, sorry all, I was
mistaken. I didn't read closely enough.  I was talking about reducing the
number of voices, not multi-timbral parts. That would mean the CPU could
update everything faster.. Please ignore any future posts.. rantings from a
crazy man..
;>)

Jeff


----- > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:38:20AM -0700, Jeff Platt wrote:
> > > My idea to get the needed bandwidth for the additional LFO
> > > processing power is to reduce the max number of
> > > multi-timbral parts from 16 to say 8. Or of needed, even to
> > > one single part.
> >
> > That would work...
>
>   How would that work in Program mode, though?  Are you saying that the
> limitation is a result of the fetching of sets of parameters?  Whether
> you're in Program in Mix more, the CPU still has to stuff the DACs with
> 16 voices worth of data.
>
> -- 
> David Evans
dfevans at bbcr.uwaterloo.ca
> Ph.D. Candidate, Computer/Synth Junkie
http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~dfevans/
> University of Waterloo         "Default is the value selected by the
composer
> Ontario, Canada           overridden by your command." - Roland TR-707
Manual
> _______________________________________________
> A6 mailing list
> A6 at roland.code404.com
> http://roland.code404.com/mailman/listinfo/a6
>