[A6] Andromizer for Windows
Jonathan Baker
jonathan at subterfuse.net
Tue Nov 5 15:02:13 PST 2002
No rant neccessary!
My favorite 3 sounds in my studio are the Andro, Virus
b, and FM7. It doesn't get any better. And honestly,
while I *love* my andro, if I had to choose just *one*
synth?... the Virus is the easy winner for me. The
Andro is ubercool and a lot of fun, but the sounds
that come from the virus pull the bones right out of
my body and make them dance around the room. Of
course, maybe it's just the skill the Virus patch
programmers. ;-) Just a personal choice.
Jonathan
--- Justin Maxwell <soc at code404.com> wrote:
> uOn Tue, 5 Nov 2002 mark.strijbos at hccnet.nl wrote:
>
> > > reason #45082 why the access virus is one of the
> best synths ever made
> > heretic !
>
> i know that's a joke, but i'm going to rant anyway:
>
> the d vs a argument gets a bit tired once one has
> been working with VSTis,
> softsynths, etc. I mean, it's great that the a6 has
> full midi control.
> That's amazing for an analog synth, and it allows a
> $3000 synth to compete
> with a $1200 one. At the same time, I can run 8
> instances of Absynth, a
> $400 program, and do 10x more what either of these
> synths can do...
>
> so in the end, i'm not a heretic, i'm just making
> the most of the
> available technology. and i advise others to do the
> same. the "heresy"
> mentality i learned from years on analogue heaven
> was the biggest
> deterrent to actually finishing my music. if you
> spend all your time
> worrying about the tools you use to create it, you
> can't see the forest
> for the trees, as the expression goes. if your goal
> is to work only with
> analogue because that's a requirement for your
> project, that's one thing,
> but if you hold some anti-digital mentality and
> pretend it makes your
> music sound any better than someone else's, you're
> only fooling yourself ;)
More information about the a6
mailing list